Apollo and General News

October 31, 2008

Legislative response in the United States to Y2K litigation

Filed under: Technology News — Tags: , , — apolloapps @ 7:55 pm

Here is an expert article from Orange County based Lawyer Todd Picker just for the Apollo News Blog…It seems that changing the way dates are recorded and calculated electronically should not be that difficult a task. As a matter of fact, the Y2K issue does not at first blush seem much harder than switching over the time on a  Rolex, but sadly, due to the relative age of the com­puter systems involved and too that computer­-generated dates may be the result of information stored in different places within the computer’s memory, very costly review, and in many cases in  neededquestion replacement of electronic data processing equipment, computer-related hardware plus software was badly to correct the problem. The overall expense of modifying them prior to the tirn of the century date rolled over to the year 2000 arrived, therefore, was enormous. Orange County and need a qualified Orange County Accident Attorney then call the Law firm of Todd Picker as he is a first rate and effecient Orange County Accident Attorney and can help with so many types of accident related cases.

While commentators speculated as to the poten­tial affects the Y2K problem might have on com­merce and day-to-day life, a general consensus emerged that a large volume of undesirable and counter-productive litigation would result. Con­sequently, in the United States resolving the Y2K issue necessarily encompassed taking into account the anticipated legal consequences arising from the problem. Congress responded by enacting the “Y2K Act”.’ The legislation’s purpose is described as follows:

1. See 15 u.s.c. 6601 et seq.

[2000) I.C.CL.R. ISSUE 4 © SWEET & MAXWELL LIMITED [AND CONTRIBUTORS)

[T]he purposes of this Act are-(l) to establish uniform legal standards that give all businesses and users of technology products reasonable incentives to solve year 2000 computer date-change problems before they develop; (2) to encourage continued remediation and testing efforts to solve such prob­lems by providers, suppliers, customers, and other contracting partners; (3) to encourage private and public parties alike to resolve disputes relating to year 2000 computer date-change problems by alter­native dispute mechanisms in order to avoid costly and time-consuming litigation, to initiate those mech­anisms as early as possible, and to encourage the prompt identification and correction of such prob­lems; and (4) to lessen the burdens on interstate commerce by discouraging insubstantial lawsuits while preserving the ability of individuals and businesses that have suffered real injury to obtain complete relief. Now, that is complicated, it really takes an attorney to understand it all.

 

Powered by WordPress